Data Gathering and Data Analysis Essay

Data Gathering and Data Analysis Essay

Data Gathering and Data Analysis Essay

Evidence-based practice projects provide new insights into how enhanced care outcomes can be achieved in nursing practice. Data collection methods often affect the reliability and validity of findings from evidence-based projects. Nurses and other healthcare providers employ rigorous methods to eliminate potential biases to the study outcomes. Experts in a specific field should be actively involved to ensure evidence-based practice projects align with practice needs and industry regulations. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the methods that would be used in identifying subject matter experts for the project, the importance of interprofessional collaborative practice and team dynamics, and system requirements.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON;Data Gathering and Data Analysis Essay

Identifying Subject Matter Experts

Subject matter experts will play an essential role in gathering and determining project requirements. As a result, they should be carefully selected to assist in the realization of the desired project outcomes. One of the methods that would be utilized in identifying subject matter experts is seeking assistance from internal organizational stakeholders. Nurse leaders, managers, and other nurses are crucial organizational stakeholders that provide valuable information about potential subject matters for the project. They provide insights into the most suitable individuals with the desired competencies to facilitate effective data collection and determination of the project requirements (Anderson-Cook et al., 2019). The other approach is developing criteria for determining the most desired subject matter experts from the obtained pool of experts. The criteria will be applied to reach the most qualified personnel to steer the project. The criteria for selecting the subject expert may consider aspects that include expert experience, competencies, their work process, communication skills, and their articulation of the project subject matter. The last approach to identifying the subject matter that would be utilized will entail the use of external sources. External sources will include referrals, experts from other institutions with experience with the project, and specialists within the industry(Anderson-Cook et al., 2019). The external sources will provide insights into the best practices that can be adopted to optimize the project outcomes.

Roles of Interprofessional Collaboration Practice

Interprofessional collaboration practice and principles of team dynamics are important when solving complex problems in health informatics. The interprofessional collaborative practice promotes collectivism in addressing the complex problems in health informatics. Nurses and other healthcare providers collaborate in identifying factors contributing to the problem, alternatives, and the best intervention to address it (Goldsberry, 2018). Collectivism contributes to the elimination of redundancies and inefficiencies contributing to the problem. Interprofessional collaboration also empowers the team members to take ownership of addressing contributing factors to the problem. Team empowerment ensures the adoption of highly efficient interventions and systems to address the problem (Goldsberry, 2018). Interprofessional collaboration practice also improves communication and coordination of activities to address the problem, hence, improvement in safety, quality, and efficiency outcomes.

Principles of team dynamics are also important in solving complex problems in health informatics. Team dynamics enhance the efficiency in addressing the problems by minimizing conflicts, disruptive behaviors, and disputes among the team members. Team dynamics also increase the level of creativity, effectiveness, and productivity among the team members in addressing the informatics problems. For example, team members collaborate to identify evidence-based innovative solutions to the problem(Lacerenza et al., 2018). Therefore, interprofessional collaborative practice and team dynamics should be adopted to address complex problems in health informatics.

Project Requirements and Systems Needed

Project requirements help identify the systems needed to obtain data for informatics projects. Accordingly, project requirements form the basis of project scope, vision, goals, and schedules. Project managers use the above information to determine the appropriate resources for achieving the desired outcomes (Miller et al., 2018). Project requirements also assist in determining the needed stakeholders to steer project assessment, planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation processes. As a result, project managers incorporate stakeholders that would assist in identifying effective and efficient systems of data collection for optimum outcomes. Lastly, project requirements guide in determining the effectiveness of the adopted systems for data collection. For example, project managers and other stakeholders evaluate the effectiveness of the adopted systems based on the achieved benchmark data (Miller et al., 2018). Therefore, project requirements should be determined before adopting health information projects.

Functional System Requirements

Functional system requirements refer to the needs that a system should fulfill in an organization to address stakeholder requirements and needs. They represent the safety, quality, efficiency, and reliability needs of the adopted systems in healthcare. The roles of functional system requirements in health informatics projects include forming the basis of system design and architecture, system integration, and validation of stakeholder needs. Functional system requirements may be used to obtain data from electronic health records. For example, the defined system requirements can be used to access patient registries and obtain specific data that relates to the informatics project (Miller et al., 2018). It can also be used to provide insights into processes related to data capture, processing, analysis, and reporting using electronic health records. Therefore, functional system requirements may guide data collection from electronic health records.

Conclusion

Overall, subject matter experts are important in collecting appropriate data for informatics projects. Carefully developed processes should be used in identifying subject matter experts. Interprofessional collaborative practice and principles of team dynamics can be used in addressing complex problems in informatics. Project requirements and functional system requirements guide the adoption of effective systems for data collection and the determination of system efficiency in addressing organizational issues.

References

Anderson-Cook, C. M., Lu, L., & Parker, P. A. (2019).Effective interdisciplinary collaboration between statisticians and other subject matter experts.Quality Engineering, 31(1), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2018.1530357

Goldsberry, J. W. (2018). Advanced practice nurses leading the way: Interprofessional collaboration. Nurse Education Today, 65, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.024

Lacerenza, C. N., Marlow, S. L., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2018). Team development interventions: Evidence-based approaches for improving teamwork. American Psychologist, 73(4), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000295

Miller, K., Mosby, D., Capan, M., Kowalski, R., Ratwani, R., Noaiseh, Y., Kraft, R., Schwartz, S., Weintraub, W. S., & Arnold, R. (2018).Interface, information, interaction: A narrative review of design and functional requirements for clinical decision support.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(5), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx118

BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON;Data Gathering and Data Analysis Essay

For this assignment, you will learn how to elicit requirements and data for the successful implementation of the project solution. Write an essay (500–750 words) addressing the following:

Discuss the process of identifying subject matter experts needed to gather data and determine requirements.
Evaluate the role of interprofessional collaborative practice and principles of team dynamics when solving a complex health informatics problem.
Determine how project requirements help identify systems needed to obtain data for informatics projects. Example project requirements: SQL database that pulls data from two systems (EHR and billing system). Data visualization reports will be created per stakeholder specifications.
Evaluate functional systems requirements and demonstrate how these may be used to gather data from an electronic health record (EHR).
Refer to “Nursing Informatics Applied Practicum Project Overview,” located in Class Resources, for further information.
Rubric
collapse Identifying Subject-Matter Experts assessment
Identifying Subject-Matter Experts
9.35 points
Criteria Description
Identifying Subject-Matter Experts

5. Target
9.35 points
A discussion of the process of identifying subject matter experts needed to gather data and determine requirements is thorough.

4. Acceptable
8.13 points
A discussion of the process of identifying subject matter experts needed to gather data and determine requirements is detailed.

3. Approaching
7.39 points
A discussion of the process of identifying subject matter experts needed to gather data and determine requirements is present.

2. Insufficient
6.92 points
A discussion of the process of identifying subject matter experts needed to gather data and determine requirements is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of the process of identifying subject matter experts needed to gather data and determine requirements is not present.

collapse Role of Interprofessional Collaborative Practices and Principles assessment
Role of Interprofessional Collaborative Practices and Principles
9.35 points
Criteria Description
Role of Interprofessional Collaborative Practices and Principles

5. Target
9.35 points
Evaluation of the role of interprofessional collaborative practice and principles of team dynamics when solving a complex health informatics problem is thorough.

4. Acceptable
8.13 points
Evaluation of the role of interprofessional collaborative practice and principles of team dynamics when solving a complex health informatics problem is detailed.

3. Approaching
7.39 points
Evaluation of the role of interprofessional collaborative practice and principles of team dynamics when solving a complex health informatics problem is present.

2. Insufficient
6.92 points
Evaluation of the role of interprofessional collaborative practice and principles of team dynamics when solving a complex health informatics problem is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Evaluation of the role of interprofessional collaborative practice and principles of team dynamics when solving a complex health informatics problem is not present.

collapse Requirement Elicitation (Data Gathering) process assessment
Requirement Elicitation (Data Gathering) process
9.9 points
Criteria Description
Requirement Elicitation (Data Gathering) process

5. Target
9.9 points
A description of the requirement elicitation (data gathering) process, including systems identification and how to obtain data from those systems, is thorough.

4. Acceptable
8.61 points
A description of the requirement elicitation (data gathering) process, including systems identification and how to obtain data from those systems, is detailed.

3. Approaching
7.82 points
A description of the requirement elicitation (data gathering) process, including systems identification and how to obtain data from those systems, is present.

2. Insufficient
7.33 points
A description of the requirement elicitation (data gathering) process, including systems identification and how to obtain data from those systems, is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the requirement elicitation (data gathering) process, including systems identification and how to obtain data from those systems, is not present.

collapse Functional Systems Requirements assessment
Functional Systems Requirements
9.9 points
Criteria Description
Functional Systems Requirements

5. Target
9.9 points
The evaluation of functional systems requirements needed to gather data from an electronic health record is thorough.

4. Acceptable
8.61 points
The evaluation of functional systems requirements needed to gather data from an electronic health record is detailed.

3. Approaching
7.82 points
The evaluation of functional systems requirements needed to gather data from an electronic health record is present.

2. Insufficient
7.33 points
The evaluation of functional systems requirements needed to gather data from an electronic health record is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The evaluation of functional systems requirements needed to gather data from an electronic health record is not present.

collapse Thesis, Position, or Purpose assessment
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
3.85 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target
3.85 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable
3.35 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching
3.04 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient
2.85 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

collapse Development, Structure, and Conclusion assessment
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
4.4 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. Target
4.4 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable
3.83 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching
3.48 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient
3.26 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

collapse Evidence assessment
Evidence
2.75 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

5. Target
2.75 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable
2.39 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching
2.17 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient
2.04 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment
Mechanics of Writing
2.75 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target
2.75 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable
2.39 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching
2.17 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient
2.04 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

collapse Format/Documentation assessment
Format/Documentation
2.75 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target
2.75 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable
2.39 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching
2.17 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient
2.04 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation o