Assessment 2 Instructions: Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Paper
Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Scoring Guide
| CRITERIA | NON-PERFORMANCE | BASIC | PROFICIENT | DISTINGUISHED |
| Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives. | Does not analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives, | Minimally analyzes a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives. | Analyzes a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives. | Analyzes a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives. Supports analysis with multiple specifics, examples, and references to current, scholarly and/or authoritative sources. |
| Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks. | Does not evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks. | Attempts to evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks; however, omissions and/or errors exist. | Evaluates the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks. | Evaluates the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks; identifies assumptions on which the evaluation is based. |
| Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. | Does not incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. | Incorporates interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes in minimal depth and detail. | Incorporates interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. | Incorporates interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes; identifies areas of uncertainty, knowledge gaps, and additional information needed to gain a more complete understanding. |
| Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative. | Does not recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative. | Recommends additional indicators and protocols but does not make a case as to how recommendations could improve or expand quality outcomes. | Recommends additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative. | Recommends additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative; impartially explains recommendations’ pros and cons. |
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
| CRITERIA | NON-PERFORMANCE | BASIC | PROFICIENT | DISTINGUISHED |
| Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented. | Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No speaker notes or audio provided. | Slides are easy to read with few editing errors. Speaker notes are sufficient to support the slides. No audio provided. | Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes and audio are provided. | Slides are easy to read and clutter free. Slide background is “visually” pleasing with a contrasting color for the text and may utilize graphics. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented. |
| Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence- based sources (published within 5 years). | Does not organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years). | Attempts to organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years); however, omissions and/or errors exist. | Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years). | Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years), exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA. |