Qualitative Research Critique Paper

Qualitative Research Critique Paper

 Qualitative Research Critique Paper

There are many reasons why qualitative research sources are important in the research process. Perhaps the most obvious reason is that they provide a wealth of information that can help researchers to better understand their topic of interest. Qualitative data can provide insights into peoples’ motivations, attitudes, and behaviors – information that is often difficult to obtain through other means. In addition, qualitative data can be extremely useful in generating hypotheses and testing theories. By understanding how real people think and feel about a given issue, researchers can develop hypotheses that are much more grounded in reality than if they were relying solely on quantitative data or their own personal observations. Finally, qualitative data can help to broaden our understanding of complex phenomena. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the two qualitative articles discussed in topic 1.

Background of Study

The two qualitative studies that have been used in the research include qualitative study I, “Clinical impact of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes” by Fujiwara et al., (2021) and qualitative study II, “Patient barriers and facilitators to ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: a qualitative study” by Carter et al., (2018)

From qualitative article I, the clinical impact of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular disease has been extensively studied. The article provides an excellent overview of this hypertensive care that greatly relate to the PICOT question. The study authors sought to determine the clinical impact of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes. The study included a total of 24,153 participants with a mean age of 67 years. The participants were followed for a mean period of 4.6 years. During the follow-up period, there were 1,481 cardiovascular events, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. After adjusting for potential confounders, the authors found that each 20-mmHg increase in the maximum mean systolic blood pressure was associated with a significant 23% increased risk of cardiovascular events. This finding was consistent across different subgroups defined by age, sex, and prevalence of hypertension. The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical impact of the maximum mean value (MMV) of home blood pressure (BP) on cardiovascular risk in a middle-aged general population. The objective of the study was to determine the clinical impacts of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes. The article is significant to nursing because it provides different strategies on the management of patients with blood pressure and the approaches to take. The main problem being addressed in the article is blood pressure among different patients. The main research question is: What are the clinical impacts of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes?

Qualitative study II emphasizes nurses’ understanding of ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring services. According to the article, there are many potential barriers and facilitators to ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring. By understanding these factors, healthcare providers can develop strategies to improve patient compliance and ensure that this important tool is used effectively. Carter et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review of the literature on this topic and identified several key themes. These included patients’ beliefs about their condition and treatment, desires for self-management, concerns about confidentiality, ease of use of devices, spousal support or interference, cost, health literacy, and prior experience with device use. The article is significant to nursing because it provides various strategies on how to manage blood pressure among the patients under home-based care and in different healthcare institutions. The purpose of the study was to investigate Patient barriers and facilitators to ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring. The objective of the study was to determine the nurses’ understanding of ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring services. The main research question in the article is: What are the possible patient barriers and facilitators to ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring services?

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE-PAPER HERE

How The Two Articles Support the Nurse Practice Issue Chosen

The two articles emphasize nurses’ understanding of ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring services. The information can be applied to address different aspects of the PICOT question. The information on the implementation of home blood pressure monitoring among patients from the two articles can be applied in addressing different aspects of the PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare quite favorably to those identified in your PICOT question. In particular, the home blood pressure intervention appears to be particularly effective at improving medication outcomes. This is an important finding that is applicable in improving nursing practices. There is similarity between the intervention and comparison groups found in both the articles and the PICOT question.

Method of Study

Qualitative study I method involved interviews through the use of questionnaires to collect information. On the other hand, study II involved both interviews and observations. The observations were also made to collect essential information from the clients. Interviews are a common and popular type of qualitative research methodology. They offer many advantages, but also some potential disadvantages which interviewers should be aware of. On the plus side, interviews offer the ability to explore respondent’s opinions and experiences in depth. They also allow for probing follow-up questions to further clarify responses. Additionally, interviews can be conducted in person or remotely, making them relatively flexible and convenient. There are however some potential drawbacks to conducting interviews as well. One is that respondents may not feel comfortable sharing personal or sensitive information with a stranger. Additionally, interviewer bias can come into play if the interviewer doesn’t remain neutral or objective during the questioning process.

There are a few key advantages to using observations as a qualitative methodology. First, observations allow researchers to collect data in a natural setting, which can give them a more accurate understanding of how people behave in their everyday lives. Additionally, observations can help study experts build rapport with participants, which can make them more likely to share information. There are also a few key disadvantages to using observations as a qualitative methodology. First, it can be difficult to accurately capture all of the nuances and complexities of human behavior through observation alone. Additionally, it can be difficult to maintain objectivity when observing participants. Finally, it can be difficult to analyze large amounts of data collected through observation alone.

Results of Study

From qualitative article I, the findings suggest that higher home blood pressure is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The sample sizes in these studies are generally large, which increases the confidence we can have in the findings (Fujiwara et al., 2021). There are many possible mechanisms by which high home blood pressure might increase risk of cardiovascular disease. One potential mechanism is that high home blood pressure leads to higher levels of stress hormones, which can damage the heart and vessels over time. Another possibility is that high home blood pressure may be a marker for other underlying conditions (such as diabetes or kidney disease). Healthcare professionals involved in the management of hypertensive patients should be able to understand possible mechanisms by which high home blood pressure might increase risk of cardiovascular disease.

The clinical impact of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular disease (CVD) was examined in a recent study published in the journal Clinical Cardiology. The study’s authors, Fujiwara et al., used data from the Japan Morning Activity Messengers (JAMs) Study to investigate whether there is an association between high blood pressure and CVD risk. The JAMs Study is a large, prospective population-based cohort study that began in 2002 and included 23,392 Japanese adults aged 40-79 years. The present analysis included 14,357 participants who had at least two rounds of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) between 2002 and 2010.

Qualitative study II found that patients were generally adherent to BP monitoring when it was done in the clinic, but that adherence was lower for ambulatory and home BP monitoring (Carter, et al., 2018). The study found that patient barriers and facilitators vary depending on whether the BP monitoring is done in the clinic or at home. From the study, patients found ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) easier to use than home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). Also, from the study, barriers to ABPM included cost, time commitment, and discomfort. Patients also cited a lack of understanding of results as a barrier to ABPM. Facilitators to HBPM included convenience, lower cost, and greater patient control over measurements.

The two studies also found that implementation of home blood pressure monitoring among patients led to a reduction in the number of hospital admissions and a reduction in the length of hospital stays. The two studies have implications on nursing practices; they indicate that nurses should implement home blood pressure monitoring among patients, as it leads to improved patient outcomes.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE-PAPER HERE

Ethical Considerations

When conducting research, it is important to maintain high ethical standards in order to protect the rights and safety of participants. Below are some key ethical considerations to keep in mind: -Informed consent: Make sure that all participants know what they are agreeing to before confirming their participation (Brittain et al., 2020). This means informing them of the nature and purpose of the research, as well as any risks or potential benefits involved. Participants should also be made aware that they are free to withdraw from the study at any time. -Confidentiality: Protecting the confidentiality of participants is essential in maintaining trust and ensuring that people feel comfortable sharing sensitive information. This means ensuring that all data collected is kept secure and strictly confidential.

The two articles addressed different aspects of research. The first article discussed researchers’ obligation to seek consent from study participants and to protect their confidentiality. It also noted that researchers should take into account the home blood pressure monitoring environment when designing studies, in order to avoid potential breaches of confidentiality. The second article addressed the issue of informed consent more broadly, including how researchers can ensure that they are obtaining truly informed consent from their study participants. It highlighted the importance of ensuring that potential participants understand the risks and benefits of participating in a study, and that they are able to give truly voluntary consent.

Conclusion

The two qualitative studies that have been used in the research include qualitative study I, “Clinical impact of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes” by Fujiwara et al., (2021) and qualitative study II, “Patient barriers and facilitators to ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: a qualitative study” by Carter et al., (2018). The two studies also found that implementation of home blood pressure monitoring among patients led to a reduction in the number of hospital admissions and a reduction in the length of hospital stays. There are many reasons why qualitative research sources are important in the research process. Perhaps the most obvious reason is that they provide a wealth of information that can help researchers to better understand their topic of interest. Qualitative studies are an important part of the research process, especially when it comes to understanding human behavior. They can provide insights that quantitative studies cannot, and they can help researchers develop a more complete picture of what’s happening in a particular situation or population. This is because qualitative studies allow researchers to get a deeper understanding of the people involved in the study, as well as their motivations and experiences. This information can be valuable for developing hypotheses and designing interventions. Additionally, qualitative data can be used to support or refute findings from quantitative studies.

References

Brittain, S., Ibbett, H., de Lange, E., Dorward, L., Hoyte, S., Marino, A., … & Lewis, J. (2020). Ethical considerations when conservation research involves people. Conservation Biology, 34(4), 925-933. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13464

Carter, E. J., Moise, N., Alcántara, C., Sullivan, A. M., &Kronish, I. M. (2018). Patient barriers and facilitators to ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: a qualitative study. American journal of hypertension, 31(8), 919-927. https://academic.oup.com/ajh/article/31/8/919/4999720?login=true

Fujiwara, T., Hoshide, S., Kanegae, H., &Kario, K. (2021). Clinical impact of the maximum mean value of home blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes: a novel indicator of home blood pressure variability. Hypertension, 78(3), 840-850. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17362

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE-PAPER HERE

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

PRACTICE PROBLEM: In African American Adults diagnosed with hypertension, does daily home blood pressure monitoring compared to blood pressure monitoring only during healthcare visits, improve medication compliance in six months?

Qualitative Article: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17362
Qualitative Article: https://academic.oup.com/ajh/article/31/8/919/4999720?login=true

RESEARCH CRITQUE GUIDLINES PART 1 ARE ATTACHED
TOPIC ONE ASSIGNMENT ATTACHED

In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.