NUR-690 Benchmark  Project Plan Essay

NUR-690 Benchmark  Project Plan Essay

Project Plan

Informatics has significantly transformed the provision of nursing care and healthcare services in the modern world. Health organizations constantly explore innovative technologies that can enable them to achieve their desired quality, safety, and efficiency goals. Nurses play crucial roles in assisting their organizations to adopt technologies that would enhance their performance and competitiveness in their markets. They also collaborate with other healthcare providers to develop project scope, processes, and stakeholders to be involved. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the development of a project plan that would be utilized in the proposed informatics project.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Importance of Stakeholders and Project Drivers

Stakeholders and project drivers will play crucial roles in the success of the proposed informatics project. The stakeholders for the project will comprise registered nurses, nurse leaders and managers, and nurse informaticists in the organization. They will play roles that include assessment, planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of the project effectiveness (Roberts, 2020). Since they are directly involved and affected by the project, the stakeholders will provide evaluation data to be used in improving project outcomes throughout the implementation process. The project drivers will comprise information technology experts in the organization, nurse informaticists, nurse leaders, and managers. The drivers will ensure the implementation of the project aligns with the developed project scope. They will also ensure efficiency in the utilization of the allocated resources (Roberts, 2020). The project manager will be tasked with crucial responsibilities that include coordination of project activities, overseeing resource allocation and utilization, conflict management, implementation of the project according to its scope, and managing stakeholder expectations. The project management office will ensure the implementation process of the project aligns with the developed scope with a consideration of resource efficiency (Roberts, 2020). The roles of the project manager and project management office ensure that the project deliverables are as per the developed plan.

Purpose and Importance of Project Milestones, Timeline, Tasks, Activities, and Resources

Project milestones, timelines, tasks, activities, and resources have crucial roles and importance in the implementation of the proposed informatics project. Project milestones are points in the developed schedule that demonstrate the achievement of specific project outcomes. Project milestones keep the team on track in the project implementation process (Bove& Houston, 2020). They also serve as project checkpoints for efficiency in the implementation process and any need for strategy improvements for enhanced project outcomes. The importance of project milestones is that they measure the team’s progress towards the realization of the ultimate project outcome. Project timelines provide a visual overview of the informatics project from its initiation to the end. Timelines assist in organizing project work and enhance accountability among project teams (Bove& Houston, 2020). Project timelines are important in enhancing efficiency among the teams involved in the implementation process.

Project tasks and activities refer to items that should be undertaken to facilitate the realization of the larger project goal. They act as essential steps towards the ultimate project completion (Roberts, 2020). Project tasks and activities motivate project teams, as their successful completion brings the project end closer, hence, re-energizing the team members. Project resources are the inputs needed for the successful implementation of a project. The resources include human, financial, and material resources(Roberts, 2020). Adequate resource supply contributes to enhanced project outcomes due to minimal disruption of the implementation process.

Project Methodologies, Tools, and Processes

Project management tools help project managers in organizing project activities. One of the project management tools that may be utilized in the proposed project is network diagrams. Network diagrams show the relationship between different project activities. The other tool is the critical path method. A project path method is a tool that enables managers to track the project in real-time. It ensures that the project activities are completed according to the developed timelines. Gannt Charts is the last tool that provides a visual representation of the project tasks and their timelines (Institute, 2021). The above tools share similarities in guiding project implementation according to the developed schedule. However, they differ from the fact that while network diagrams provide information on the interrelationship between processes, Gannt Charts and the critical path method provide real-time tracking of the project processes.

Analytical Methods and Processes

Analytical methods and processes in project management help understand facts, issues, and problems in a project to forecast the potential project outcomes. Analytical techniques that will apply to the proposed informatics project include simple profiling, regression analysis, and cross-tabulation (Roberts, 2020). Simple profiling will entail characterizing project attributes to offer a comprehensive understanding of the project deliverables. Cross tabulation entails developing categorical data for project activities that will be used for assessment purposes (Roberts, 2020). Regression analysis will be performed to provide a detailed understanding of the relationship between project variables and their influence on project outcomes.

Strategies that Promote Success and Sustainable Implementation of New Informatics Solutions

One of the strategies that promotethe successful and sustainable implementation of new informatics solutions within health care organizations is organizational support. Health organizations should provide the support needed for the implementation of informatics projects. The support exists in forms that include the creation of effective organizational culture, human, financial, and material support. The second strategy is encouraging evidence-based practices in nursing. Nurses should constantly explore evidence-based informatics solutions to enhance the safety, quality, and efficiency of patient care(Bove& Houston, 2020). The difference in the proposed strategies is that while the first relies mainly on the organization, the second focuses on the provider role in informatics in nursing and health care.

Conclusion

Overall, a developed project plan should be explicit to guide the implementation process in the proposed informatics project. Project milestones, timelines, tasks, activities, and resources will be important for the project’s success. Project tools will be used to achieve optimum outcomes. Strategies to promote sustainability in the proposed project will be explored.

References

Bove, L. A., & Houston, S. M. (2020).Project Management Skills for Healthcare: Methods and Techniques for Diverse Skillsets.Taylor & Francis.

Institute, P. M. I. P. M. (2021).A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition and The Standard for Project Management (RUSSIAN). Project Management Institute.

Roberts, P. (2020). Absolute Essentials of Project Management.Taylor & Francis Group.

BUY A CUSTOM-FREE PAPER HERE

NUR-690 Benchmark – Project Plan –

Status
For this assignment, you will research and learn how to develop a project plan. In 750-1,000 words, address the following criteria:

Evaluate the importance of the various stakeholders and project drivers. Include the role of the Project Manager (PM) and the Project Management Office (PMO) for large information technology projects and explain how these roles contribute to a successful leadership model.
Analyze the purpose and importance of including project milestones, timeline, tasks, activities, and resources.
Compare and contrast two or three possible project methodologies, tools, and processes that can be used in the design and management of a project.
In preparation for the “Project Plan – Practicum Task” assignment, determine the analytical methods and processes you will use for the practicum project. Provide a rationale to support your choices.
Compare and contrast two strategies that promote successful and sustainable implementation of new informatics solutions within health care organizations.
You will not include the time it takes to complete this task as part of your practicum hours.

You are required to cite a minimum of three scholarly resources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and health care and health informatics content.

Refer to “Nursing Informatics Applied Practicum Project Overview,” located in Class Resources, for further information.

You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and health care and health informatics content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric
collapse Importance of Stakeholders and Project Drivers assessment
Importance of Stakeholders and Project Drivers
10.8 points
Criteria Description
Importance of Stakeholders and Project Drivers

5. Target
10.8 points
Evaluation of the importance of the various stakeholders and project drivers is thorough.

collapse Including Project Milestones, Timelines, Tasks, Activities, and Resources assessment
Including Project Milestones, Timelines, Tasks, Activities, and Resources
12.6 points
Criteria Description
Including Project Milestones, Timelines, Tasks, Activities, and Resources

5. Target
12.6 points
A discussion of the purpose and importance of including project milestones, timeline, tasks, activities, and resources is thorough.

4. Acceptable
10.96 points
A discussion of the purpose and importance of including project milestones, timeline, tasks, activities, and resources is detailed.

3. Approaching
9.95 points
A discussion of the purpose and importance of including project milestones, timeline, tasks, activities, and resources is present.

2. Insufficient
9.32 points
A discussion of the purpose and importance of including project milestones, timeline, tasks, activities, and resources is present but lacks details or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of the purpose and importance of including project milestones, timeline, tasks, activities, and resources is not present.

collapse Project Methodologies, Tools, and Processes assessment
Project Methodologies, Tools, and Processes
12.6 points
Criteria Description
Project Methodologies, Tools, and Processes

5. Target
12.6 points
Comparison of up to three possible project methodologies, tools, and processes that can be used in the design and management of a project is thorough.

4. Acceptable
10.96 points
Comparison of up to three possible project methodologies, tools, and processes that can be used in the design and management of a project is detailed.

3. Approaching
9.95 points
Comparison of up to three possible project methodologies, tools, and processes that can be used in the design and management of a project is present.

2. Insufficient
9.32 points
Comparison of up to three possible project methodologies, tools, and processes that can be used in the design and management of a project is present but lacks details or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Comparison of up to three possible project methodologies, tools, and processes that can be used in the design and management of a project is not present.

collapse Analytical Methods and Processes (B) assessment
Analytical Methods and Processes (B)
13.5 points
Criteria Description
Analytical methods and processes (C2.4)

5. Target
13.5 points
A description of the analytical methods and processes to be used for the practicum project, including a rationale to support the choices, is thorough.

4. Acceptable
11.75 points
A description of the analytical methods and processes to be used for the practicum project, including a rationale to support the choices, is detailed.

3. Approaching
10.67 points
A description of the analytical methods and processes to be used for the practicum project, including a rationale to support the choices, is present.

2. Insufficient
9.99 points
A description of the analytical methods and processes to be used for the practicum project, including a rationale to support the choices, is present but lacks details or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the analytical methods and processes to be used for the practicum project, including a rationale to support the choices, is not present.

collapse Strategies to Promote Successful and Sustainable Implementation (B) assessment
Strategies to Promote Successful and Sustainable Implementation (B)
13.5 points
Criteria Description
Successful and sustainable implementation (C3.2)

5. Target
13.5 points
A description of two strategies that promote successful and sustainable implementation of new informatics solutions within health care organizations is thorough.

4. Acceptable
11.75 points
A description of two strategies that promote successful and sustainable implementation of new informatics solutions within health care organizations is detailed.

3. Approaching
10.67 points
A description of two strategies that promote successful and sustainable implementation of new informatics solutions within health care organizations is present.

2. Insufficient
9.99 points
A description of two strategies that promote successful and sustainable implementation of new informatics solutions within health care organizations is present but lacks details or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of two strategies that promote successful and sustainable implementation of new informatics solutions within health care organizations is not present.

collapse Thesis, Position, or Purpose assessment
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
6.3 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target
6.3 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable
5.48 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching
4.98 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient
4.66 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

collapse Development, Structure, and Conclusion assessment
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
7.2 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. Target
7.2 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable
6.26 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching
5.69 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient
5.33 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

collapse Evidence assessment
Evidence
4.5 points
Criteria Description
Evidence

5. Target
4.5 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable
3.92 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching
3.56 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient
3.33 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

BUY A CUSTOM-FREE PAPER HERE

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment
Mechanics of Writing
4.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target
4.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable
3.92 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching
3.56 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient
3.33 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

collapse Format/Documentation assessment
Format/Documentation
4.5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target
4.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable
3.92 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching
3.56 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient
3.33 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.