NRS 490: Literature Evaluation Table & PICOT Question Assignment

NRS 490: Literature Evaluation Table & PICOT Question Assignment

Learner Name: Debra Berglund

PICOT:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE-PAPER HERE

Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article	Article Title and Year Published	Research Questions/ Hypothesis, and Purpose/Aim of Study Struggling to meet your deadline ? Get assistance on NRS 490: Literature Evaluation Table & PICOT Question Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW! Meet My Deadline	Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or other)	Setting/Sample	Methods: Intervention/ Instruments	Analysis/Data Collection	Outcomes/Key Findings	Recommendations	Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Proposed EBP Practice Project Proposal
Ali, A. F. R., Al-Arnous, M. A. O., Khattab, M. E. M. E., & Mowafy, S. M. S. (2021). Comparison Study between Opioid Free and Opioid Based General Anesthesia in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 85(2), 3730-3736. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2021.203757	Article title: Comparison Study between Opioid Free and Opioid Based General Anesthesia in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries   Year of publication: 2021	This study was conducted with the aim of comparing opioid-free vs. opioid-based general anesthesia in functional endoscopic sinus surgeries on postoperative pain and operation time.	Quantitative. Translational Research Type: T2 research It assesses the value of intervention to develop evidence-based guidelines	A total of forty-four patients were recruited into the study, with twenty-two in the opioid-free group and twenty in the opioid-based group.	In a randomized comparative clinical study, the patients in the opioid-free group were given paracetamol, IV bolus of magnesium sulfate, lidocaine infusion. The opioid-based group was given fentanyl.	Data was collected through laboratory investigation, basic clinical examination, and throughout history.	Significant outcomes include: -The duration of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit was found to be shorter in the opioid-free group as compared to the opioid-based group. In addition, the participants in the opioid-based group also displayed higher VAS scores at six, ten, and twelve hours postoperative.	Opioid-free management offered substantial pain control. However, there is a need to conduct a study with a larger number of patients as well as for longer periods of time.	This study supports the proposed EBP practice project proposal as it shows that the use of opioid-free management led to better pain management.
Siddiqui, T. H., Choudhary, N., Kumar, A., Kohli, A., Wadhawan, S., & Bhadoria, P. (2021). Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in total intravenous anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, 37(2), 255. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Fjoacp.JOACP_253_18	Article title: Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in total intravenous anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled study   Year of publication: 2021	The study was conducted with the aim of comparing non-opioid (dexmedetomidine) and opioid (fentanyl) based techniques of anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery.	Quantitative Translational Research Type: T2 research It assesses the value of intervention to develop evidence-based guidelines	A total of ninety patients between the ages of eighteen and sixty were recruited into the study, with half of them randomized into either of the groups.	Using a randomized controlled study, the patients were placed in either the Fentanyl group or Dexemedetomidine group. The intervention used for the non-opioid group was an injection of dexmedetomidine followed by intravenous infusion. The opioid-based group received an injection of fentanyl followed by an intravenous infusion.	Data was collected through laboratory investigation, while the analysis of the collected data was done using statistical testing. SPSS version 17. 0 was used for data analysis	Among the key findings is that the patients in the opioid-free group took a long time to recover and get discharged from PACU than those in the opioid-based group. Indicating that the use of opioids was superior in pain management.	The researchers recommend that a bigger sample size be used in a similar study for improved statistical validation. They also recommend the use of target-controlled infusion pumps for better drug titration.	Even though this study indicated that the opioid-based drug was better in pain management, it shows that the use of non-opioid-based medication also led to significant pain management hence supporting the proposed intervention.
Bhardwaj, S., Garg, K., & Devgan, S. (2019). Comparison of opioid-based and opioid-free TIVA for laparoscopic urological procedures in obese patients. Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, 35(4), 481. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Fjoacp.JOACP_382_18	Article title: Comparison of opioid-based and opioid-free TIVA for laparoscopic urological procedures in obese patients Year of publication: 2019	The research was conducted with the aim of comparing the impact of opioid-based anesthesia and opioid-free based anesthesia among obese patients undergoing laparoscopic urological procedures.	Quantitative Translational Research Type: T2 research It assesses the value of intervention to develop evidence-based guidelines	This study had a total of eighty participants between the ages of twenty and sixty.	This study is also a randomized, blinded controlled study where forty participants were randomized into the opioid-based group, while the remaining forty were randomized into the opioid-free group. The individuals in the opioid-based group were given fentanyl, followed by Atracurium. The non-opioid-based group received dexmedetomidine followed by Atracurium.	Data was collected through laboratory investigation basic clinical examination. Data analysis was done with the help of a data analyst. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 21.	The key findings include: The PACU discharge times and postoperative analgesic requirements were found to be significantly less in the individual in the opioid-free group. This observation was connected with fewer side effects, decreased opioid requirements, and better pain control.	The researchers restricted the study to laparoscopic urological procedures. Hence they recommend that other laparoscopic procedures be explored. More studies are also required to support the findings in this research and help in awareness creation in the clinical practice.	The findings support the proposed intervention since it shows that the use of non-opioid-based drug pain management was more efficacious as compared to opioid-based management.
Hakim, K. Y. K., & Wahba, W. Z. B. (2019). Opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia improves the postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy. Anesthesia, Essays, and Researches, 13(2), 199. http s://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Faer.AER_74_19	Article title: Opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia improves the postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy.   Year of publication: 2019	This study aimed at comparing the patient recovery postoperative between opioid-based total intravenous anesthesia and opioid-free TIVA	This was a quantitative study. Translational Research Type: T3 research Attempts to diffuse research or clinical findings	The researchers recruited a total of eighty female patients to take part in the study.	This was a prospective, randomized controlled comparative study. The study participants were equally randomized into the opioid-based group and opioid-free group. Prior to anesthesia, the patients in the opioid-free group received IV dexmedetomidine while the other group got IV fentanyl over five minutes.	Data was collected through laboratory investigation basic clinical examination. The collected data were analyzed through the use of SPSS version 20.	From the data analyzed, it was evident that the patients in the opioid-free group had better pain management as indicated by pain scores as compared to those in the opioid-based groups.	Similar studies need to be done while including bigger populations	This source also supports the proposed intervention since it shows that the use of a non-opioid strategy is effective in various perioperative outcomes such as pain management.
Toleska, M., & Dimitrovski, A. (2019). Is opioid-free general anesthesia more superior for postoperative pain versus opioid general anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?. prilozi, 40(2), 81-87.Doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2019-0018	Article title: ). Is opioid-free general anesthesia more superior for postoperative pain versus opioid general anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?. Year of publication: 2019	This study aimed at determining the impact of opioid-based and opioid-free general anesthesia on postoperative pain in patients who were to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy.	Quantitative Translational Research Type: T2 research It assesses the value of intervention to develop evidence-based guidelines	The researchers recruited a total of sixty individuals to take part in the study.	This study was a prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical study with the participants randomized into either the opioid group or opioid-free group. The individual in the opioid-free group received dexamethasone intravenously. While the ones in the opioid group received fentanyl.	Data was collected using various processes, such as the use of the Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS score). Data was also collected from laboratory investigations. Data were analyzed using SPSS for windows 17.0	Some of the main findings include: During the postoperative period, the patients in the fentanyl groups showed higher pain scores as compared to the opioid-free general anesthesia, showing the efficacy of non-opioid-based management.	-The researchers recommend the use of opioid-free anesthesia in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.	This source also supports the proposed intervention as it shows that the use of non-opioid intervention for pain management is efficacious and even more potent than the use of opioid-based drugs.
Aboelela, M. A., & Alrefaey, A. K. (2021). Opioid free versus opioid-based anesthesia in abdominal gynecological surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care, 25(5), 653-659. https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v25i5.1642	Article title: Opioid free versus opioid-based anesthesia in abdominal gynecological surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial   Year of publication: 2021	The aim of this study was to compare opioid-based and opioid-free anesthesia in abdominal gynecological surgery in terms of side effects and analgesic efficacy.	Quantitative Translational Research Type: T2 research It assesses the value of intervention to develop evidence-based guidelines	This study had a total of sixty-eight patients who were divided equally into two groups.	This was a prospective randomized, double-blinded study with two groups, opioid-free anesthesia, and opioid-based anesthesia. While the opioid-free groups were given ketamine and Atracurium, the opioid group was offered fentanyl and Atracurium.	Data was collected through trained nurses who were recording the data. Data were analyzed through the use of IBM SPSS software version 22.	The analysis of the data revealed various findings, including: -The pain scores were significantly lower in the opioid-free groups during the first four postoperative hours as compared to the opioid-based group.	The researchers recommend a follow-up for more than twenty-four hours to find out the impacts.	This study also supports the proposed intervention as it shows that the use of non-opioid-based ketamine-lidocaine is effective in pain management for gynecological surgery.
Atif, M., Saeed, U., Khurshid, T., Haque, I. U., Khokhar, M. R., & Tassadaq, F. (2019) Effect of intraoperative lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia: A randomized controlled trial. http://www.imj.com.pk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/3.-OA-971-07-19-Effect-of-intraoperative-lidocaine-infusion-on-postoperative.pdf	Article title: Effect of intraoperative lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia: A randomized controlled trial Year of publication: 2019	The main objective of this study was to examine the impact of non-opioid-based (lidocaine) intravenous infusion on postoperative pain scores among patients undergoing abdominal surgery.	Quantitative study. Translational Research Type: T2 research It assesses the value of intervention to develop evidence-based guidelines	This study recruited a total of eight adult patients to take part in study.	The study is a randomized controlled trial where a total of eighty patients took part. Forty were assigned into the first group who got lidocaine bolus, followed by IV, while the remaining forty were assigned into the saline group.	The data was collected through various strategies. The visual analog scale was used in collecting pain scores, while other data was collected through laboratory investigation. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 23 software IBM.	This research also revealed various significant findings: -the use of lidocaine infusion led to low pain scores in the first twelve hours post-operation. In addition, no medication toxicity was observed, indicating the efficacy and safety of lidocaine in postoperative pain management.	The researchers recommend that lidocaine infusion should be used as an alternative to opioids for pain management.	The article supports the proposed intervention in that it shows the efficacy of using a non-opioid-based medication in postoperative pain management. This could be an indication that non-opioid-based medication can be better than opioids, especially due to the negative effects of opioids.
Rudikoff, A. G., Tieu, D. D., Banzali, F. M., Nguyen, C. V., Rettig, R. L., Nashed, M. M., … & Mason, K. P. (2022). Perioperative Acetaminophen and Dexmedetomidine Eliminate Post-Operative Opioid Requirement following Pediatric Tonsillectomy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(3), 561.	Article title: Perioperative Acetaminophen and Dexmedetomidine Eliminate Post-Operative Opioid Requirement following Pediatric Tonsillectomy Year of publication: 2022	The study was conducted to determine if a combination of acetaminophen and dexmedetomidine can eliminate opioid requirements postoperatively.	Quantitative Translational Research Type: T3 research Attempts to diffuse research or clinical findings	This study involved a total of six hundred and eighty-one patients. While the patients in the opioid group received fentanyl, the other group received dexamethasone.	While the patients in the opioid group received fentanyl, the other group received dexamethasone.	Data were collected from electronic medical records. Data were analyzed using SAS statistical software version 9.4	Among the key findings is that the use of the non-opioid-based combination protocol eliminated the need to use opioids in the postoperative recovery time. This shows that a combination of dexmedetomidine and acetaminophen is efficacious in postoperative pain management	The researchers recommend a design of a large prospective randomized controlled study for better and more valid outcomes.	This study also supports the intervention since it shows the efficacy of a combination of non-opioid-based drugs in controlling pain after surgery.
Enten, G., Shenouda, M. A., Samuels, D., Fowler, N., Balouch, M., & Camporesi, E. (2019). A retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia versus opioid anesthesia for general cesarean section. Cureus, 11(9). Doi: 10.7759/cureus.5725	Article title: A retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia versus opioid anesthesia for general cesarean section. Year of publication: 2019	This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the feasibility of multi-modal opioid-free anesthesia for cesarean delivery.	Quantitative Translational Research Type: T2 research It assesses the value of intervention to develop evidence-based guidelines	This study recruited a total of seventeen patients	The study had two groups, the opioid anesthesia group, and the opioid-free anesthesia group. While nine patients got opioid anesthesia, the remaining eight received opioid-free anesthesia.	The researchers collected data from electronic medical records. The data were analyzed using statistical software.	The analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in pain scores between the two groups as reflected in the visual analog scale. The implication is that opioid-free medication can easily be used in the place of opioid-based medications.	The researchers recommend that a larger prospective study should be performed to perform a full evaluation of opioid-free anesthesia in cesarean delivery.	This article supports the intervention as it shows a comparable influence of opioid-free intervention with opioid-based management.
Leas, D. P., Connor, P. M., Schiffern, S. C., D’Alessandro, D. F., Roberts, K. M., & Hamid, N. (2019). Opioid-free shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study of a novel clinical care pathway. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 28(9), 1716-1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.01.013	Article title: Opioid-free shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study of a novel clinical care pathway   Year of publication: 2019	The study was performed with the major aim of investigating the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of opioid-free perioperative intervention among patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.	Mixed method study Translational Research Type: T2 research It assesses the value of intervention to develop evidence-based guidelines	A total of thirty-five patients were recruited to take part in the study.	A multimodal intervention was used where patients received celecoxib and gabapentin preoperative. After the operation, the patients received ketorolac and gabapentin.	The nursing staff collected the necessary data. Data were analyzed statistically using SAS version 9.4	This study also revealed relevant findings. For example, the patients showed stable low pain scores even up to 24 hours post-operative, indicating how efficacious the protocol was.	The researchers are recommending a further investigation to help in determining the applicability of the intervention in a more generalized population.	This source also supports the proposed intervention as it shows the efficacy of opioid-free medication in postoperative pain management.

References

Aboelela, M. A., & Alrefaey, A. K. (2021). Opioid free versus opioid based anesthesia in abdominal gynecological surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care, 25(5), 653-659. https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v25i5.1642

Atif, M., Saeed, U., Khurshid, T., Haque, I. U., Khokhar, M. R., & Tassadaq, F. (2019) Effect of intraoperative lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia: A randomized controlled trial. http://www.imj.com.pk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/3.-OA-971-07-19-Effect-of-intraoperative-lidocaine-infusion-on-postoperative.pdf

Ali, A. F. R., Al-Arnous, M. A. O., Khattab, M. E. M. E., & Mowafy, S. M. S. (2021). Comparison Study between Opioid Free and Opioid Based General Anesthesia in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 85(2), 3730-3736. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2021.203757

Bhardwaj, S., Garg, K., & Devgan, S. (2019). Comparison of opioid-based and opioid-free TIVA for laparoscopic urological procedures in obese patients. Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, 35(4), 481. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Fjoacp.JOACP_382_18

Enten, G., Shenouda, M. A., Samuels, D., Fowler, N., Balouch, M., & Camporesi, E. (2019). A retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia versus opioid anesthesia for general cesarean section. Cureus, 11(9). Doi: 10.7759/cureus.5725

Hakim, K. Y. K., & Wahba, W. Z. B. (2019). Opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia improves postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy. Anesthesia, Essays and Researches, 13(2), 199. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Faer.AER_74_19

Leas, D. P., Connor, P. M., Schiffern, S. C., D’Alessandro, D. F., Roberts, K. M., & Hamid, N. (2019). Opioid-free shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study of a novel clinical care pathway. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 28(9), 1716-1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.01.013.

Rudikoff, A. G., Tieu, D. D., Banzali, F. M., Nguyen, C. V., Rettig, R. L., Nashed, M. M., … & Mason, K. P. (2022). Perioperative Acetaminophen and Dexmedetomidine Eliminate Post-Operative Opioid Requirement following Pediatric Tonsillectomy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(3), 561.

Siddiqui, T. H., Choudhary, N., Kumar, A., Kohli, A., Wadhawan, S., & Bhadoria, P. (2021). Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in total intravenous anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomised controlled study. Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, 37(2), 255. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Fjoacp.JOACP_253_18

Toleska, M., & Dimitrovski, A. (2019). Is opioid-free general anesthesia more superior for postoperative pain versus opioid general anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?. prilozi, 40(2), 81-87.Doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2019-0018

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE-PAPER HERE

Conduct a search for 10 peer-reviewed, translational research articles published within the last 5 years that demonstrate support for your PICOT. You may include previous research articles from assignments completed in this course. Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” provided to evaluate the articles and explain how the research supports your PICOT.

Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature Table – Rubric

Collapse All Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation Of Literature Table – RubricCollapse All

PICOT

7.5 points

Criteria Description

PICOT

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The PICOT is clearly and accurately presented.

4. Good

6.9 points

NA

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

NA

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

NA

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The PICOT is omitted.

Articles

15 points

Criteria Description

Articles

5. Excellent

15 points

Sources are current and highly appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are accurate.

4. Good

13.8 points

Sources are current and generally appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented, but there are minor errors.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

Number of required sources is met, but some sources are outdated or inappropriate. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented, but there are errors.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Number of required sources is only partially met. Article citations and permalinks are presented. One or more links do not lead to the intended article.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Required number of sources are not included. Article citations and permalinks are omitted.

Research Question, Hypothesis, Purpose or Aim of Study

15 points

Criteria Description

Research Question, Hypothesis, Purpose or Aim of Study

5. Excellent

15 points

A discussion on the research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study is thoroughly and accurately presented for each article.

4. Good

13.8 points

Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is adequately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is presented, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for one or more articles is omitted.

Study Design

15 points

Criteria Description

Study Design

5. Excellent

15 points

A thorough and accurate discussion on the study design for each article is presented.

4. Good

13.8 points

The study design is adequately presented for each article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

The study design is indicated for each article. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

The study design for each article is presented, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The study design for one or more article is omitted.

Setting and Sample

15 points

Criteria Description

Setting and Sample

5. Excellent

15 points

The setting and sample in which the researcher conducted the study are detailed and accurate for each article.

4. Good

13.8 points

The setting and sample are adequately presented for each article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

The setting and sample are indicated for each article. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

The setting and sample are indicated for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The setting and sample are omitted for one or more of the articles.

Methods

15 points

Criteria Description

Methods

5. Excellent

15 points

A thorough and accurate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented.

4. Good

13.8 points

An adequate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

The method of study for each article is presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

The method of study is presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Method of study for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the methods of study are incomplete.

Analysis and Data Collection

15 points

Criteria Description

Analysis and Data Collection

5. Excellent

15 points

A thorough and accurate discussion on the analysis and data collection for each article is presented.

4. Good

13.8 points

An adequate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

Analysis and data collection for each article are presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Analysis and data collection are presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Analysis and data collection for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the analysis and data collection are incomplete.

Outcomes and Key Findings

15 points

Criteria Description

Outcomes and Key Findings

5. Excellent

15 points

A thorough and accurate discussion on the outcomes and key findings collection for each article are presented.

4. Good

13.8 points

An adequate discussion on outcomes and key findings for each article are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE-PAPER HERE

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

Outcomes and key findings for each article are presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Outcomes and key findings are presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Outcomes and key findings for one or more articles are omitted. Overall, the outcomes and key findings are incomplete.

Recommendations

15 points

Criteria Description

Recommendations

5. Excellent

15 points

Researcher recommendations are accurately and thoroughly described for each article.

4. Good

13.8 points

Researcher recommendations for each article are accurately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

Researcher recommendations for each article are presented. Researcher recommendations described for one article are inaccurate or incomplete.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Researcher recommendations are indicated for each article. The researcher recommendations described for two of the articles are inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Researcher recommendations are omitted for one or more of the articles. The recommendations described for three or more articles are inaccurate or incomplete.

Explanation of How Articles Support Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

15 points

Criteria Description

Explanation of How Articles Support Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

5. Excellent

15 points

A detailed explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Support for the evidence-based project proposal is clearly evident.

4. Good

13.8 points

An explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Adequate support for the evidence-based project proposal is demonstrated.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

A general explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. The explanation for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. Support for the evidence-based project proposal is generally evident.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

An explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. The explanation for two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of how the article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is omitted for one or more of the articles. The explanation for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete.

Mechanics of Writing

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

6.9 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.