NR326 Mental Health Nursing Essay

Scholarly Article Review

Over time, mental disorders have increased the illness burden as the proportion of people with mental health challenges increases. Such burdens are far-reaching since health care costs, mortality and morbidity, and individual and family-level challenges increase proportionality. Figueroa et al. (2020) reported that mental health care costs consume approximately 6% of the national health care spending. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is among the commonly reported mental disorders in health care settings. Its impacts are multidimensional: it affects behaviors, emotions, mood, and overall productivity adversely (Kintzle et al., 2018). Unless prevented and treated comprehensively, PTSD will continue affecting people’s health profoundly. Research on PTSD is extensive and explores various aspects of the critical mental disorder, including vulnerabilities, control, and management. The purpose of this paper is to review a scholarly article on PTSD, primarily focusing on prevalence and risk factors.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Article Summary

The current health practice is largely data-driven. The same applies to mental health care, implying that statistical data is essential for understanding a mental disorder to promote comprehensive care and evidence-based interventions. The article by Einvik et al. (2021) examines the prevalence and risk factors of PTSD among hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. One of the key statistics to support the significance of PTSD in mental health care is its connection with critical illnesses. Einvik et al. (2021) found that 17-44% of critical illness survivors show acute PTSD symptoms. COVID-19 is the leading cause of PTSD in the current practice, with 12-22% of COVID-19 patients showing critically significant symptoms. More research has been proposed to examine how COVID-19 affects the persistence of PTSD symptoms.

Einvik et al. (2021) highlighted key points relevant in the control and management of PTSD. One of the key points is that PSTD’s severity depends on symptom load, challenges experienced during COVID-19 management, and gender. Einvik et al. (2021) found that PTSD was high in females (8.6% vs. 6.3%) and patients who experienced dyspnea during COVID-19 hospitalization. Previous depression and symptom load were the main risk factors in non-hospitalized patients. In this case, COVID-19 patients are at risk of PTSD whether hospitalized or receiving home-based care. As a result, mental health practitioners must be keen on COVID-19 patients since their vulnerability to PTSD is high.

Regarding the use of evidence in nursing practice, mental health practitioners must comprehensively understand people’s vulnerabilities to mental health challenges. Such an understanding will enable them to provide patient-centered and relevant interventions. The article provides an in-depth analysis of the connection between PTSD and COVID-19. It shows the need for mental health practitioners to collaborate with other professionals to manage COVID-19. The article further highlights the risk factors of PTSD among COVID-19 patients. As a result, it can be used as a reference to improve health outcomes among COVID-19 patients and patients with PTSD due to COVID-19. Overall, the evidence can be used to prevent and effectively manage PTSD among COVID-19 patients.

Article Critique

The article is a comprehensive analysis of an issue causing distress in today’s health practice. As an indicator of its strengths, the article analyzes the connection between COVID-19 and PTSD by providing statistics and referencing other peer-reviewed articles. Besides statistics, critical in data-driven care, Einvik et al. (2021) also recommended various practices to control PTSD during COVID-19 management. Such practices include avoiding environments that lead to higher stress reactions. Einvik et al. (2021) further emphasized the need for information and care environments that provides calmness, a sense of safety, and hope. Such environments reduce the risk of complications. Despite these strengths, the article has several weaknesses. The leading weakness is its bias towards females and adults over 50 years of age. It focused too much on this population, limiting its generalizability. The other weakness is the failure to consider other relevant factors increasing the risk of PTSD among COVID-19 patients, such as living with children and previous mental health conditions.

Critiquing a research article effectively determines whether other health care professionals should improve their knowledge by reading it. I would recommend the article to a colleague for three reasons. Firstly, it is a comprehensive analysis of an issue troubling mental health practice. The article discusses the prevalence, risk factors for hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and the types of environments needed to improve recovery. Secondly, it provides data to inform mental health professionals on the severity of PTSD among COVID-19 patients. Thirdly, it is a valuable reference for improving knowledge on mental illnesses management and development over time. It illustrates how PTSD’s dynamics change in COVID-19 patients, implying the need for patient-centered care in mental health practice.

Conclusion

Like other health professionals, mental health practitioners should improve their knowledge of illness management over time. Reading peer-reviewed articles is an effective strategy. The article reviewed in this discussion analyzes the connection between PSTD and COVID-19. It examines the prevalence, risk factors, and recommendations to enhance patient outcomes. As mental health professionals continue developing mechanisms to enhance patient outcomes, they should increasingly rely on current evidence to promote evidence-based practice. Eventually, they will be in an excellent position to control PTSD and other mental disorders increasing illness burden and health care costs.

References

Einvik, G., Dammen, T., Ghanima, W., Heir, T., &Stavem, K. (2021).Prevalence and risk factors for post-traumatic stress in hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2079. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042079

Figueroa, J. F., Phelan, J., Orav, E. J., Patel, V., &Jha, A. K. (2020). Association of mental health disorders with health care spending in the Medicare population. JAMA Network Open, 3(3), e201210-e201210. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1210

Kintzle, S., Barr, N., Corletto, G., & Castro, C. A. (2018). PTSD in U.S. veterans: The role of social connectedness, combat experience and discharge. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 6(3), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6030102

BUY A CUSTOM- PAPER HERE

NR326 Mental Health Nursing

RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

Purpose

The student will review, summarize, and critique a scholarly article related to a mental health topic.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

(CO 4) Utilize critical thinking skills in clinical decision-making and implementation of the nursing process for psychiatric/mental health clients. (PO 4)

(CO 5) Utilize available resources to meet self-identified goals for personal, professional, and educational development appropriate to the mental health setting. (PO 5)

(CO 7) Examine moral, ethical, legal, and professional standards and principles as a basis for clinical decision-making. (PO 6)

(CO 9) Utilize research findings as a basis for the development of a group leadership experience. (PO 8)

 

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 100 points

Preparing the assignment

• Follow these guidelines when completing this Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
  1. Select a scholarly nursing or research article, published within the last five years, related to mental health The content of the article must relate to evidence-based practice.
     • You may need to evaluate several articles to find one that is
  2. Ensure that no other member of your clinical group chooses the same article, then submit your choice for faculty
  3. The submitted assignment should be 2-3 pages in length, excluding the title and reference
• Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric must match exactly).
  1. Introduction (10 points/10%)
     • Establishes purpose of the paper
     • Captures attention of the reader
  2. Article Summary (30 points/30%)
     • Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care
     • Key points of the article
     • Key evidence presented
     • Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice
  3. Article Critique (30 points/30%)
     • Present strengths of the article
     • Present weaknesses of the article
     • Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague
  4. Conclusion (15 points/15%)
     • Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text
     • Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper
     • Is clearly written
  5. Article Selection and Approval (5 points/5%)
     • Current (published in last 5 years)
     • Relevant to mental health care
     • Not used by another student within the clinical group
     • Submitted and approved as directed by instructor
  6. APA format and Writing Mechanics (10 points/10%)

 

NR326 Mental Health Nursing

RUA: Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

 

• Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure
• No spelling or typographical errors
• Document includes title and reference pages
• Citations in the text and reference page

 

For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online library.

 

Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.

 

Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

 

Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available)	Highest Level of Performance	High Level of Performance	Satisfactory Level of Performance	Unsatisfactory Level of Performance	Section not present in paper
Introduction (10 points/10%)	10 points		8 points	0 points
Required criteria 1.    Establishes purpose of the paper 2.    Captures attention of the reader	Includes 2 requirements for section.		Includes 1 requirement for section.	No requirements for this section presented.
Article Summary (30 points/30%)	30 points	25 points	24 points	11 points	0 points
Required criteria 1.    Statistics to support significance of the topic to mental health care 2.    Key points of the article 3.    Key evidence presented 4.    Examples of how the evidence can be incorporated into your nursing practice	Includes 4 requirements for section.	Includes 3 requirements for section.	Includes 2 requirements for section.	Includes 1 requirement for section.	No requirements for this section presented.
Article Critique (30 points/30%)	30 points		25 points	11 points	0 points
Required criteria 1.    Present strengths of the article 2.    Present weaknesses of the article 3.    Discuss if you would/would not recommend this article to a colleague	Includes 3 requirements for section.		Includes 2 requirements for section.	Includes 1 requirement for section.	No requirements for this section presented.
Conclusion (15 points/15%)	15 points		11 points	6 points	0 points
1.    Provides analysis or synthesis of information within the body of the text 2.    Supported by ides presented in the body of the paper 3.    Is clearly written	Includes 3 requirements for section.		Includes 2 requirements for section.	Includes 1 requirement for section.	No requirements for this section presented.
Article Selection and Approval (5 points/5%)	5 points	4 points	3 points	2 points	0 points
1. Current (published in last 5 years)	Includes 4	Includes 3	Includes 2	Includes 1	No requirements for

 

2.    Relevant to mental health care 3.    Not used by another student within the clinical group 4.    Submitted and approved as directed by instructor	requirements for section.	requirements for section.	requirements for section.	requirement for section.	this section presented.
APA Format and Writing Mechanics (10 points/10%)	10 points	8 points	7 points	4 points	0 points
1.    Correct use of standard English grammar and sentence structure 2.    No spelling or typographical errors 3.    Document includes title and reference pages 4.    Citations in the text and reference page	Includes 4 requirements for section.	Includes 3 requirements for section.	Includes 2 requirements for section.	Includes 1 requirement for section.	No requirements for this section presented.
Total Points Possible = 100 points