Doctoral Strategies Essay and Attestation

Doctoral Strategies Essay and Attestation

Doctoral Strategies Essay and Attestation

One of the most challenging and uniquely autonomous programs is doctoral learning, as it requires a student to take personal initiative to learn and participate in activities and programs necessary for the successful completion of the program. As such, it is key that a DNP student develops strategies that can effectively help them maintain an appropriate and healthy balance between personal, professional, and academic life (Taylor & Terhaar, 2018). Therefore, the purpose of this assignment is to explore various aspects of the doctoral learning journey, such as the concerns regarding matriculating through the DNP program and how the insights gained from the orientation webinar helped mitigate the concerns, the program’s expectations and challenges, and a plan to be used to be a successful DNP learner.

Concerns about Matriculating

            I had been looking forward to becoming a doctoral learner at one moment in my life—however, the reality of being one set in when I finally registered as a doctoral student. However, interaction with peers, friends, and family made me have various concerns regarding matriculating through the DNP program. One of the concerns is family and study life balance. Doctoral learning is a rigorous process, and I was concerned about how I would have the right balance between my study life and family. Another concern was how I would meet the AACM core competencies, as the activities and strategies were not clear to me.

I had a concern about how I would get the right resources to enable me to complete the journey successfully. However, attending the Doctor of nursing orientation webinar helped in addressing the concerns. First, I got an insight into the necessary activities to undertake, including writing reflection papers, engaging in discussions, and completing class assignments. Insights into choosing the right and a good mentor also helped address my concerns as a mentor will be an important person in the doctoral learning process (GCU., 2019). Therefore, the webinar offered a concise outline of the expectations and requirements for effectively completing the program.

Expectations of the Program and Potential Challenges

            As a doctoral learner, there are various expectations. One of the expectations is to take a proactive approach and self-initiative to undertake self-directed learning to help fulfill the requirements of the program (Zaccagnini & Pechacek, 2019). I am expected to be an autonomous learner and, therefore, carefully handle the research projects and all the learning associated with the journey. It is also expected that I manage my time well and ensure that I hand in assignments in time and use a scholarly tone and style in completing them. However, some of the challenges I might experience include a lack of proper time management, the feeling of loneliness, and being overwhelmed. However, I have various personal strengths that may help me persevere through the DNP program. I like learning and embracing change to correct my mistakes. This will be key in adapting to the demands of the program and ensuring that I correct any wrongdoing and adjust to help complete the program and meet the objectives.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE-PAPER HERE

The Plan to be A Successful DNP Learner

            The several demands of the DNP learning mean that a student has to come up with an appropriate plan to address various aspects such as self-directed learning, autonomy, and time management. First, I will engage in mentorship programs as it will help guide me through the doctoral program, such as planning and implementing projects. In terms of time management, I will formulate a timetable that creates a routine (Zaccagnini & Pechacek, 2019). This will ensure that I create and maintain the appropriate momentum required. For self-directed learning, I am planning to participate in discussions with classmates and access online sources with appropriate resources for the program. Various resources will be key in helping me be more proficient. The DNP practice immersion workspace will be key as the online community will enable access to various information and also create and share. It also offers a good platform for collaboration which will be key to becoming more proficient. The reading resources will also be appropriate as they contain relevant information to improve proficiency.

Conclusion

The uniquely autonomous nature of the doctoral learning process requires that a student is well prepared to enhance their chances of successfully completing the program. Therefore, an individual has to come up with appropriate strategies that can enhance time management and self-directed learning. Such strategies have been explored as well as some of the ways to manage potential barriers. The learning experiences associated with the doctoral learning program majorly entail self-perseverance and the autonomous nature of this learning. The tools such as the “Doctor of Nursing Orientation Webinar” and the online communities such as the DNP practice immersion workspace should be used appropriately by the student to help them realize success and also complete the DNP program.

References

Grand Canyon University (2019, Aug 1). Doctor of Nursing Orientation Webinar. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iauwp7-5cO0&feature=youtu.be

Taylor, L. A., & Terhaar, M. F. (2018). Mitigating barriers to doctoral education for nurses. Nursing education perspectives, 39(5), 285-290. Doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000386.

Zaccagnini, M., & Pechacek, J. M. (2019). The Doctor of nursing practice essentials: A new model for advanced practice nursing. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE-PAPER HERE

Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to introduce the method of critical thinking required for searching, evaluating, and organizing research articles to support your proposed PICOT-D question.

General Requirements:

Utilize the attached “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete this assignment.
Use the “Levels of Evidence in Research” chart, located in Class Resources, to assist in completing the assignment.
Use the “Searching Nursing Databases,” located on the Doctor of Nursing Practice page in the GCU Library, to assist in completing the assignment.
A minimum of five primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of your anticipated graduation date, are required to complete this assignment.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Directions:

For this assignment, you will search for and evaluate literature to identify supporting evidence for your proposed PICOT-D question from your “PICOT-D Question Template.” Complete the following:

Review the “Levels of Evidence in Research” chart and the “Literature Evaluation Table” document prior to beginning this assignment. Refer to the criteria on these respective documents for identifying and evaluating acceptable research for your future DPI Project.
Conduct a search in the GCU Library using the nursing databases and find a minimum of five primary quantitative research articles to support your PICOT-D question. Two must provide direct support for your proposed intervention. You may use research articles from your previous assignments if the articles meet the specified criteria for this assignment.
Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” to evaluate the quality of the primary quantitative research articles you selected for PICOT-D question. As you evaluate the selected articles, remove and replace any articles that fail to meet the criteria on the table.
If your intervention is a clinical practice guideline, or is coming from a clinical practice guideline, identify your clinical practice guideline in Table 3 of the “Literature Evaluation Table” and include the primary quantitative research from the clinical practice guideline in Table 1 (PICOT-D Question) or Table 2 (Intervention).
Once you have five primary quantitative research articles identified, submit the “Literature Evaluation Table.”
Attachments
DNP-801A-RS6-LiteratureEvaluationTable.docx